The two cameras look very similar from a noise standpoint at lower ISOs, and they resolve similar amounts of detail, with maybe a very slight edge to the Sony. The noise differences don’t become truly visible until around ISO 3200, where the Sony shows slightly finer grain structure and slightly cleaner detail. Both cameras retain good detail up to ISO 12,800, while the Fuji loses a small amount of detail at ISO 25,600. At ISO 6400 and below, the two cameras are extremely close in noise performance…I’d estimate 1/3 stop difference or less. At ISO 12,800 and 25,600, the difference is a bit more pronounced, but still less than a half a stop difference, which I think shows a great performance from the X-Pro 2.While the color fidelity of both cameras is fairly impressive as ISOs climb, it is particularly neutral with the X-Pro 2, which shows no noticeable color cast as ISOs increase. But most telling is in looking at the whole images, where the dark background of the images show distinct differences. The X-Pro 2 maintains good color control here and shows no visible banding.Now take a look at the Sony image at ISO 25,600, below. While the well illuminated areas show slightly less noise, the dark background shows some pattern noise and maybe even some slight banding, with a slight purple color cast. There’s even what appears to be some sensor heat artifacts in one spot along the top edge, to the left of the book, that is showing some purplish blobs. Comparing both full size images, I prefer the overall look from the X-Pro 2 at this ISO.Looking at the performance as a whole, the A7 II has a very slight edge at medium to high ISOs, but it’s a small lead. This is quite impressive for an APS-C sensor. Well done, Fuji!
Merci Tonio , très intéressant,et comme dit Zack Arias , la technologie évolue ... Dx ou fx la différence est minime...
Je note qu'on a les mêmes références : j'adore cet artiste
Je m' en tape c'est en anglais !
