Premier retour terrain avec un X100F que ce photographe chanceux a eu en main depuis début novembre :https://petapixel.com/2017/01/20/2-months-fujifilm-x100f/(désolé aux allergiques, l'article est en anglais...)Quelques extraits :"The lens resolved wonderfully on the 24mp sensor. I was able to walk away with stunning detail from a tiny little camera. I believe this is the same lens seen in the previous models, and it is still just as excellent as it was on the older sensor. The bokeh is very pleasant and has a smooth aesthetic to it.""Functionally, the camera reminds me of a shrunk down X-Pro2 with a tiny 23mm lens fixed to it. I love that.""Speaking of autofocus, I was sort of hoping this camera would be just as speedy as the X-T2, but that wasn’t the case. While it was certainly fast enough for me to get the job done and done accurately, don’t expect the speed of the x-T2. That’s about my only gripe about this camera: it’s autofocus isn’t DSLR quality. That’s not a huge deal, and as I mentioned earlier it’s still plenty fast to get whatever shot I wanted.""I want to mention the x100 series cameras as the best investment you could make. The x100 series offers everything you could want in a general camera, and resells quite nicely."
Au niveau batteries, elles sont identiques à celles du X-T2, c'est ça ?
Un peu déçu que le bloc optique reste le même, pour le reste la fiche technique est assez logique.
Pour les curieux du rendu, 57 images avec EXIF prises au X100F sur DPReview :https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/7972459793/fujifilm-x100f-beta-samples-gallery
Pas mal. Il prend presque tout au 125eme de seconde et il sous-expose d'un ou deux tiers d'IL.
Il n'y a pas de quoi se rouler par terre non plus... ces mêmes photos auraient pu être prises avec un X-100, S ou T , on n'y verrait aucune différence. Enfin, c'est mon avis.